This story is filed under Election 2005.
This segment was made available on Friday, October 28th, 2005.

Prop. 73 :: CC Guide to the Ballot Guides

 

Proposition 73 was rejected by voters in the November 2005 election.

PROP. 73

Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor’s Pregnancy State of California

This is an initiative constitutional amendment.

Should the California Constitution be amended to require notification of the parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated, pregnant minor at least 48 hours before performing an abortion on the minor?

Amends California Constitution, defining and prohibiting abortion for unemancipated minor until 48 hours after physician notifies minor’s parent/guardian, except in medical emergency or with parental waiver. Mandates reporting requirements. Authorizes monetary damages against physicians for violation.

Official Text (PDF)

In 1987, the legislature ordered doctors to obtain parental consent before performing an abortion on a minor. That law was struck down as unconstitutional in 1997. This measure would compel doctors to inform a minor’s parents before performing an abortion. It also introduces a legal definition of the fetus that is consistent with “Pro-Life” beliefs.

  • Background: Legal & Practical Controversies Related to
    Parental Notification Law
    , HealthVote.org, begins “Both sides for this ballot measure have their horror stories and poignant protagonists.”
  • Adolescents and Abortion, Advocates for Youth (PDF), notes: “Each year, 750,000 to 850,000 teenage women in the United States experience pregnancy… 74 to 95 percent of these pregnancies are unintended.” Continuing, they report that “[i]n 1999, the most recent year for which data are available, over 148,000 teenage pregnancies ended in abortion.” (The preceding figures are credited primarily to the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.)


Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.
Comment on this story